The magnitude and complexity of expressions of workplace violence also involve the legal system, whose decisions establish boundaries between the problems and needs linked to various trends of violence in an organizational context. The institutions in charge of regulating workplaces in the exercise of rights and responsibilities are increasingly called upon to make decisions concerning the phenomenon of workplace violence. In some regions around the world, legal authorities have begun, as a first step, to act in response to the great change in mentality regarding family violence, a phenomenon which is increasingly drawing attention.
In various countries, even where laws regulating occupational health and safety do not deal explicitly with violence in the context of the workplace, governments consider that these laws compel the employer to make sure that such violence does not occur.
In the United Kingdom, the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 has made any behaviour comparable to harassment an offence http://www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/1997040.htm. Even though this legislation is not specific to workplace violence, its application covers harassment perpetrated in the workplace as well as in other social contexts. In France, the Loi du 17 janvier 2002, or the Loi de modernisation sociale (social modernization law), criminalizes the behaviours involved in moral harassment in the workplace and distinguishes this kind of harassment from workplace discrimination. Also in Europe, the Loi sur le bien-être des travailleurs dans l'exécution de leur travail (law on the well-being of workers carrying out their work) came into force in Belgium on June 25, 2002 http://www.securisan.be/LOIS/Loi 19960804 bienetre.htm. This law includes provisions which are specific to moral harassment in the prevention of problems related to occupational health and safety.
In the United States, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Act http://www.epa.gov/reg5oopa/defs/html/osha.htm, as well as similar laws in each state, require employers to provide their employees with a workplace which is free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm. At least 15 American states recognize as tort on the part of the employer the fact of not taking reasonable precautions during recruitment to check the background of people who could represent a danger to other workers or the public. The employer's duty to take precautions and gather intraining, however, must be balanced against the right to privacy and to non-discriminating hiring practices.
In Canada
Chapter 42, among others, of the Canada Labour Code http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en (see Canada Labour Code) requires the employer, through consultation with occupational health and safety committees, to make sure that solutions are developed to protect employees who work alone from the risks that come with the social isolation inherent in the nature of their work.
In Quebec
The diversity and plurality of all the avenues of legal recourse make them more complex for victims.
Civil Code of Quebec and charters of rights
Act respecting labour standards
Act respecting industrial accidents and occupational diseases
Canadian Criminal Code